Short biography of prophet muhammad pdf editor

Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Texts Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.

Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape "Donate to the archive" User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. When the Moon Split by Mubarakpuri — If you wan to read seerah without delving in to too many details, then this is the book for you. It is also available on YouTube as an audiobook. It does not go into much details.

It is a good resource to check quick facts about his life. The footnotes provided by the editor are also helpful and give further details of differences of opinion over various facets of his life and whether the stated fact is based on a reliable source or not. Nadwi was not just an Islamic scholar but also a historian. He also wrote another more detailed book on the topic that you can read as well.

This third version is very straightforward and can even be given to kids in middle school to read. He covers the seerah in 29 lectures about an hour each. Seerah of Prophet Muhammad by Yasir Qadhi — This is perhaps the most thorough and detailed lecture series on the life of the Messenger pbuh done in the English language. Noble Life of the Prophet 3 Vols.

The translators also include footnotes from well-known commentaries on the book. He attempts to emotionally connect the reader to the beloved of Allah pbuh. If you read it properly, you would not pass a day except by sending darood on the Messenger pbuh. Little was written down, but instead passed onto others via sayings and stories; unlike the Roman empire which had codified rules and history books to study from.

From these two basic arguments, you should then wonder how Martin Ling has began such a vivid story of his life before his birth. If you read other books in Islamic history, especially those of Western scholarship, you will notice that the history before Muhammad's mission is vague at best. Martin Ling overlooks this fact and instead presents you with plenty of fanciful stories regarding Muhammad during his early years.

You may be more knowledgeable and say, "No no, it happened, it is in the Sira, the biography of Muhammad". That would be to then overlook the massive amount of false recordings of Muhammad that emerged during and after his death. In fact, this is perhaps the greatest problem of Islam in modern times. False teachings, false recordings, have becoming so intermingled with the core teachings of Islam, that separating the two has become near impossible.

Past the Qur'an, it is difficult to ascertain the accuracy of any document. Yet, Martin Ling goes to vividly into details of "miracles" that occurred. I do not recommend this book to readers if they want to learn about Muhammad and the history of Islam. I instead recommend Karen Armstrong's book on Muhammad that focuses more on the message and philosophy of Muhammad and its revolutionary nature.

In comparison, Martin Ling's book is a book of miracles and fantasies that will confuse a Western reader and have them dismiss Muhammad altogether. Muhammad's message is beautiful, but that message is not in this book. I've had this book 3 times and each time it winds up going to live at someone else's house. That's how good it is! Irving Karchmar.

Author 9 books 43 followers. Martin Ling's biography of the Prophet Muhammad, based on the earliest available sources, is a masterpiece of engaging writing on a immense topic, and he carries it off beautifully. From his birth and early life to his first marriage and the vision in the cave of the angel Gabrial, who ordered him to "recite," the Koran, this enthralling life is the best work on the subject so far.

I loved it, and reread it often. Highly recommended to all who wish to know what Islam is about. Agak lama ambil masa nak tamatkan bacaan sebab sambung baca antara senggang bacaan lain. Jarang nak baca naskhah bukan fiksyen tapi tertarik nak hadam jalan cerita kehidupan Rasullah dari awal kelahiran hingga wafat dan kebetulan ada cabaran bacaan Ramadan.

Terjemahan yang kemas dan sedap susunannya. Naskhah yang bagus, boleh belek baca di mana-mana bab kalau sesekali nak tenangkan hati baca hal sirah Rasulullah dan berkenaan Islam.

Short biography of prophet muhammad pdf editor

It can be a delicate matter reviewing books that involve sacred texts and holy people. Let me be clear: this is a review of Muhammad the biography. It is not a review of Muhammad the Prophet. He had a brief career overseeing eastern manuscripts at the British Museum and Library. This biography of Muhammad was written in and received prizes from governments in Pakistan and Egypt, as well as international acclaim from Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

I really liked the narrative structure of this book, as well as the relative wealth of information included for a single volume, but I did have a few nitpicks about it. For one, the history isn't explored too much. Lings seems to use accounts of certain events that aren't even the most well-known, much less the most authenticated. It's almost as if he added in some elements of fiction or at least speculation to fill in the gaps.

I'm sure this sort of book is hardly easy to write, but I would've liked to see some more thorough research. I can't really complain, though, since the book is still very well-written and provides a good summary of the events that occurred during his lifetime. Wirotomo Nofamilyname. Tanpa menyadari ada banyak hal yang membuat mereka tidak mau menerima Islam dan memusuhi Muhammad dan para pengikutnya.

Mungkin tetap tidak bisa bisa dibenarkan sikap seperti itu, tapi saya jadi lebih bisa memahaminya. Sistri k. Iman Danial Hakim. Author 9 books followers. Azimah Othman. Surprisingly an extremely easy read. I enjoyed it very much. The first book that made me feel as if I really know the Prophet. I love the war chapters. Though very detailed, it made me feel as if I was there witnesssing them.

Sajith Kumar. Martin Lings was born in England and spent his higher studies in the US. At 31, he went to Cairo and became a lecturer in Cairo University. He learned Arabic and got immersed in the study of Sufism. He converted to Islam and adopted Abubakar Sirajuddin as his new name. Lings produced and staged Shakespearean plays which were always a fascination for him.

He belonged to the perennialist stream of mystical philosophy and considered himself as a Sufi. The author wanted to be known by his adopted Muslim name in later life, but the publishers of this book continues to use his old Christian name as some kind of a ruse to attract people belonging to other religions. Though written in an archaic style, it is comparatively new, having published for the first time in Muhammad, as we all know, is the prophet of Islam who established his new, monotheistic religion among the tribes of Arabia in the seventh century CE.

Arabian polity was strongly riven by tribal affiliations. Blood feud was common, which escalated ordinary scuffles that can be expected in any society, to murder and retaliatory assassinations in return. At least, they remained so till his death. An example cited in the book is exemplary to enlighten his message of accommodation.

When the clans in his own tribe of Quraysh could not come to terms on who should be privileged to carry the sacred black stone inside Kabah, he intervened with an ingenious plan which was acceptable to all. The prophet asked for a piece of cloth to be brought inside and placed the holy relic in the middle of it. Then he asked the tribal elders of all clans to carry the cloth together and that settled the issue amicably.

Similarly in Yathrib, to where he was forced to migrate, the tribes of Aws and Khasraj were always in a state of civil war. Muhammad ended the strife and united the people of Medina Yathrib. This united army humbled all the other tribes of Arabia. Jewish scholars also did the same, which shows the common thread of ecclesiastical etiquette that binds the three religions.

Arabia was the sanctuary of paganism at that time. Hubal was the chief god worshipped in Kabah. Three goddesses al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat were worshipped in the other nearby towns. Jews expressed their displeasure of the idolatry when they stopped visiting Kabah after the idol of Hubal was placed there. Quraysh of the pre-Islamic period were very tolerant.

They even allowed an icon of the Virgin Mary and the child to be painted on an inside wall of Kabah p. Even when the prophet was thrown out of Mecca, Muslims were still allowed to stay in the city and permitted to pray in the Kabah. The Quraysh hurled insults on the Muslims, who sometimes responded with violence. Muhammad and his followers used to pray in the glens outside Mecca clandestinely.

The Quraysh saw them and ridiculed them, which ended in blows. Naturally, the prophet was excommunicated from Mecca as a result of this. Muhammad and his religion were not disposed to return the tolerance enjoyed by them at the hands of the Quraysh. One of his disciples, Abu Dharr of the Bani Ghifar tribe organized highwaymen to waylay the caravans of Mecca but would offer to give back what he had taken on condition that the traders would testify to the oneness of god and the prophethood of Muhammad — in other words, accept Islam p.

The book abounds with instances of such highhandedness. The Quraysh even allowed the prophet and his entourage to visit Kabah while they stayed out of the city. But no such magnanimity was showed in return. As soon as the holy city came in Muslim hands, the pagans were banned from visiting the shrine, which continues to this day. Intolerance is the hallmark of organized Islam in the present world.

The believers abused others at will, but the reverse of it was not permitted. In another instance of short temper, we see the antecedents of the attack on the offices of the French magazine Charlie Hebdo, which published caricatures of the prophet. People who claim that violence is not the Islamic answer to rebuke would be hard put to explain these narrative tales in this book.

The archaic language puts some readers off, but the structure of the book is logical and impartial, to a great extent. Supernatural occurrences are reduced to a minimum. The narrative does not feel like an original English text, which is expected when facts are heavily borrowed from early Arabic texts. It also includes a good index on places, persons, books and tribes.

The book is recommended. Luthfi Ferizqi. To be honest, I discovered this book through a YouTube channel that recommended it. I immediately searched for the book and, thank God, found that it had been translated into Indonesian, spanning more than pages. I was truly impressed with the Indonesian translation. Previously, when I first started my career, I tried reading Sirah Nabawiyah, a biography of the Prophet that is often recommended as one of the best and most award-winning works.

However, for some reason, it felt more like a rigid textbook, which made me lose interest. My deepest gratitude to you. Unlike most of the positive reviews that you'll see, this isn't a review of Martin Lings nor is it a review of the Prophet Muhammad pbuh. This is a review on the actual book I originally read this book as a teenager and really struggled with the portrayal of Muhammad pbuh in some chapters of this book.

I can't comprehend how anyone with an objective mind could ever praise this book to an English non-Muslim audience living in the 21st Century. This book has many sections that have very weak sources that contradict the very nature of what we are taught about the personality of Muhammad pbuh, without explaining why those contradictions occur.

I would never recommend this book to anyone who knows nothing about Islam. Adil Salahi references his various resources and as far as I've found , doesn't once use the primary dubious source that Martin Lings used in his book. Ramiz Qudsi. The thing with the Muslims writer in general is that when they start writing about the life and deeds of the Prophet they are so much in awe of the personality that they can barely portray him as a normal human being.